| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 |
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 |
Editor Login
Convener in chief:
David Lazer
(Methodology, Networked Governance)
Editors:
Stanley Wasserman
(Current Trends, Methodology, Social Networks)
Allan Friedman
(Simulations)
Nathan Eagle
(Technology, Social Computing, Powerlaws, Current Trends)
Ben Waber
(Technology, Social Computing) Thomas Langenberg
(Technology, Social Computing, Social Networks, Current Trends)
Ines Mergel
(Knowledge Sharing, Social Computing, Social Software, Current Trends)
Brian Rubineau
(Social Dynamics, Societal Networks, Simulations)
Maria Binz-Scharf
(Qualitative Methodology, Knowledge Sharing, eGovernment)
Jeff Boase
(Technology, Societal networks)
Alexander Schellong
(Admin, eGovernment, Citizen Relationship Management)
Categories
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Recent Entries
- Save the data! the Dataverse Network initiative
- Computing Culture: National Communication Logs
- Paper on voluntary engagement now downloadable from this site
- Published: Voluntary engagement in knowledge sharing
- Facebook vs MySpace
Recent Comments
- Re: social psych and social network analysis
By: Brand Search
Date: May 11, 2006 8:30 AM
Notification
« Unknowability: Implications of Darwinian Preadaptions for Economic Growth and Policy | Main | NSA data collections »
9 May 2006
social psych and social network analysis
Speaking of fields and social network analysis, psychology offers an interesting puzzle for the relative paucity of psych-related social network analysis. Much of the classic early work in network analysis involved psychologists: Newcomb, Bavelas, Festinger, Heider, the Robbers Cave experiments. Yet in the 1960s (my impression is) the field veered away from social network analysis, which took refuge in sociology and anthropology. Perhaps this is due to power of the Asch experiments, which paradigmatically displaced much of the other work (Newcomb, Festinger) on social influence, bringing the focus more to the group level than network.
Posted by David Lazer at May 9, 2006 8:21 AM
-
.
- Business (3) .
- Citizen Relationship Management (16) .
- Commentary (6) .
- Complexity (2) .
- Current Trends (43) .
- eGovernment (20) .
- Events/Announcements (63) .
- Innovation (13) .
- Internet (15) .
- Knowledge Sharing (18) .
- Methodology (30) .
- Networked Governance (18) .
- Networks in political science (2) .
- PNG Working Paper Series (6) .
- Powerlaws (4) .
- Reviews (2) .
- Simulations (1) .
- Small group networks (3) .
- Small Worlds (2) .
- SN in the news (68) .
- Social Capital (3) .
- Social Computing (10) .
- Social Finance (1) .
- Social Networking Platforms (10) .
- Social Psychology (2) .
- Social Software (24) .
- Societal Networks (35) .
- Technology (29)
Comments
Asch's contribution to the development of modern psychology trends is of great importance and I agree with you that his experiments ousted the accomplishments of the predecessors and contemporaries. People are likely to conform to gain respect and favour of the certian group and because they presume the group knows much more than they do.
Posted by: Brand Search at May 11, 2006 8:30 AM