| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 |
5 |
6 |
7 | 8 |
9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 | 28 |
29 |
Editor Login
Convener in chief:
David Lazer
(Methodology, Networked Governance)
Editors:
Stanley Wasserman
(Current Trends, Methodology, Social Networks)
Allan Friedman
(Simulations)
Nathan Eagle
(Technology, Social Computing, Powerlaws, Current Trends)
Ben Waber
(Technology, Social Computing) Thomas Langenberg
(Technology, Social Computing, Social Networks, Current Trends)
Ines Mergel
(Knowledge Sharing, Social Computing, Social Software, Current Trends)
Brian Rubineau
(Social Dynamics, Societal Networks, Simulations)
Maria Binz-Scharf
(Qualitative Methodology, Knowledge Sharing, eGovernment)
Jeff Boase
(Technology, Societal networks)
Alexander Schellong
(Admin, eGovernment, Citizen Relationship Management)
Categories
Business
Citizen Relationship Management
Commentary
Complexity
Current Trends
Events/Announcements
Innovation
Internet
Knowledge Sharing
Methodology
Networked Governance
Networks in political science
PNG Working Paper Series
Powerlaws
Reviews
SN in the news
Simulations
Small Worlds
Small group networks
Social Capital
Social Computing
Social Finance
Social Networking Platforms
Social Psychology
Social Software
Societal Networks
Technology
eGovernment
Archives
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Recent Entries
- Interview: Thorsten Jacobi on the current state and trends in social software
- Online Social Network User Fatigue?
- Second Call for Papers / Funding for doctoral student training for Harvard conference on networks
- Obama, techology, and social networks
- Tapping on the wisdom of the crowd: Social network analysis software tools on Wikipedia
Recent Comments
- Re: Clinton v Obama: battle of the fund raising networks
By: Ben Waber
Date: May 8, 2007 7:48 PM
Notification
« Wayne Baker on Social Capital and Generalized Reciprocity | Main | Networked Publics »
6 May 2007
Clinton v Obama: battle of the fund raising networks
Interesting article in today's Boston Globe about the competition for dollars between Obama and Clinton in Massachusetts. Of particular relevance to this blog is the following quote:
"You don't give to causes, you give to friends," said mystery writer Robert Parker of Cambridge, who contributed $4,600 to Obama. "Larry Tribe asked me to contribute to Obama, and so I did." But Parker added that while he would like to see Obama win the nomination, "I'm not an enthusiastic political supporter of anyone."
This highlights the fact that contributions are, in part, mobilized through social networks of like-minded people. It would be interesting to examine the contribution data as 2-mode network data (candidates x contributors) to see (1) how contributors are connected; and (2) how candidates over time are linked to each other through their contributors.
Posted by David Lazer at May 6, 2007 8:44 PM
-
.
- Business (2) .
- Citizen Relationship Management (13) .
- Commentary (5) .
- Complexity (2) .
- Current Trends (40) .
- eGovernment (15) .
- Events/Announcements (51) .
- Innovation (12) .
- Internet (14) .
- Knowledge Sharing (16) .
- Methodology (28) .
- Networked Governance (14) .
- Networks in political science (1) .
- PNG Working Paper Series (6) .
- Powerlaws (4) .
- Reviews (2) .
- Simulations (1) .
- Small group networks (3) .
- Small Worlds (2) .
- SN in the news (56) .
- Social Capital (2) .
- Social Computing (9) .
- Social Finance (1) .
- Social Networking Platforms (8) .
- Social Psychology (2) .
- Social Software (22) .
- Societal Networks (33) .
- Technology (27)
Comments
It seems that the strength of tie would be particularly meaningful here, since if a large corporation connected two competing candidates but there was a large disparity in the dollar amount you would have data indicating that a donor was hedging their bets, rather than actually linking two candidates.
Posted by: Ben Waber at May 8, 2007 7:48 PM