| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 |
5 |
6 |
7 | 8 |
9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 | 28 |
29 |
« Notes on government CRM - Citizen Relationship Management | Main | The small world of investing »
6 June 2007
It will be interesting to observe the impact of Fred Thompson’s incipient entry into the race for the Republican nomination. One part of the story will be the competition for voters. Another will be the competition for dollars. Per earlier entries on the election, a key to mobilizing resources for a run at the Presidency is the network of big money donors. Interestingly, the competition should be particularly brutal among candidates who are in a similar position (“structurally equivalent”) in the fundraising network. If candidates A and B both are friends with C, then A and B are in competition for C’s dollars. The empirical question, in Thompson’s case, is who is he most structurally equivalent to. My naïve guess is that among the big three, McCain would be, with both drawing on a conservative Washington financial base. Giuliani and Romney likely both have fairly structurally distinct financial foundations. In any case, we should be able to tell more by looking at the second quarter financial reports. It also would be interesting to examine who has contributed to more than one candidate, and which candidates tend to draw from the same part of the network.
Posted by David Lazer at June 6, 2007 8:10 PM