February 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18

19

20 21 22 23

24

25

26

27

28

29  

Editor Login


Convener in chief:


David Lazer
(Methodology, Networked Governance)

Editors:


Stanley Wasserman
(Current Trends, Methodology, Social Networks)

Allan Friedman
(Simulations)

Nathan Eagle
(Technology, Social Computing, Powerlaws, Current Trends)

Ben Waber
(Technology, Social Computing)
Thomas Langenberg
(Technology, Social Computing, Social Networks, Current Trends)

Ines Mergel
(Knowledge Sharing, Social Computing, Social Software, Current Trends)

Brian Rubineau
(Social Dynamics, Societal Networks, Simulations)

Maria Binz-Scharf
(Qualitative Methodology, Knowledge Sharing, eGovernment)

Jeff Boase
(Technology, Societal networks)

Alexander Schellong
(Admin, eGovernment, Citizen Relationship Management)

Categories

Archives

Recent Entries

Recent Comments

Notification


« Monetizing social networks more difficult than expected | Main | Jennifer Chayes »

5 February 2008

More on the Massachusetts primary...

A few more observations about the primary in Massachusetts: I voted this morning, apparently in the midst of heavy turnout. There is this charming tradition of sign holding for candidates outside of the voting areas. I don't know how common this is-- certainly, it wasn't the case in other states I have lived and voted in (Michigan and New Jersey). It is all quite civil-- I walked by the Obama (two) and Clinton (one) sign holders and they were talking about local affairs. There no Romney signs, notably, since this is his home town (although I am sure he votes in the higher rent precinct). And, of course, the sign holders are members of the community, so people who pass by always are stopping to chat with the sign holders. These little exchanges, I think, are the microscopic civic foundations of a democracy.

Posted by David Lazer at February 5, 2008 9:41 AM

Comments

"These little exchanges, I think, are the microscopic civic foundations of a democracy."

I think you are right. And they point back to yours just earlier: the impact of a neighbor, rather than carpet-bagger, soliciting your vote.

And it also puts in larger relief: How do those 'geographic' - physical - connections compare with what we think are new connections but at a physical distance, on the web? If one is 'more real,' how do we describe that, and compare?

Posted by: David Allen at February 5, 2008 10:27 AM

I also think this is true for some elections (this one) though I am not sure the exchanges are always there and they often can be downright hostile. Having been a sign holder at many elections including the recent local Mayoral race in Quincy MA, the sign holders were respectful but kept their distance. No cross-talk where I was located.

One candidate was backed by the police, firemen and teachers as he was seen as supporting their efforts for wage increases and no increases in health insurance co-pays. The other candidate and incumbent had a run-in with the teachers as he wanted to avoid a tax increase. He had a lot of home owner backing.

The little bit of dialog that took place in public debates was shrill. The debates held online and in letters to the editor was quite contentious with neither side giving much ground.
Outside the polls each side seemed conscious of not antagonizing the other as the months of campaigning had built up a lot of pressure.

If you supported the incumbent you were seen as against firemen, policemen and teachers. Those groups were intimidating for many.

My lawn sign was dug up and tossed in the street twice and once replaced with the other candidate's sign.

None of it was very edifying.

It would take me a week to outline what it was like at the Statehouse during votes on the gay marriage amendment.

Posted by: Stephen Coady at February 6, 2008 9:46 AM

Notification

Enter e-mail address to receive notification of new comments to this entry

Post a comment




Remember Me?