August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3

4

5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Editor Login


Convener in chief:


David Lazer
(Methodology, Networked Governance)

Editors:


Stanley Wasserman
(Current Trends, Methodology, Social Networks)

Allan Friedman
(Simulations)

Nathan Eagle
(Technology, Social Computing, Powerlaws, Current Trends)

Ben Waber
(Technology, Social Computing)
Thomas Langenberg
(Technology, Social Computing, Social Networks, Current Trends)

Ines Mergel
(Knowledge Sharing, Social Computing, Social Software, Current Trends)

Brian Rubineau
(Social Dynamics, Societal Networks, Simulations)

Maria Binz-Scharf
(Qualitative Methodology, Knowledge Sharing, eGovernment)

Jeff Boase
(Technology, Societal networks)

Alexander Schellong
(Admin, eGovernment, Citizen Relationship Management)

Categories

Archives

Recent Entries

Recent Comments

Notification


« Networks in Political Science (NIPS) program | Main | The contagiousness of smoking? »

19 May 2008

Family ties as bridging ties

I have been a low volume blogger over the last several months due to a full load of teaching obligations, but will crank it up a bit over the next month.

I always learn something when I teach my networks class. One of the early exercises that I have students do is a personal network self evaluation (adapted from Baker’s book on social capital). The students’ networks tend to be highly educated, very international, ages 25-30. Essentially, the networks of students tend to look a lot like themselves. What is notable (I base this on the last 3 years of doing this exercise) is where the networks look most different from the students, which is, more often than not, in ties to family members. Family ties are somewhat less likely to be highly educated, and when they are, it is often in a different domain than that of the other people in the students’ network, and, unsurprisingly, they are often (literally) of a different generation.

I think this reflects a broader truth about our ties to family and friends. We are born into our families, but we choose our friends. That flexibility of friendship tends to bring with it homogeneity. If we differ too much from our friends, we get new friends. If we differ too much from our family, we just don’t bring up sex/religion/politics during the holidays.

The notable corollary to this is that while social network scholars often think of family ties as the ultimate in bonding/strong ties, they, in fact, may offer bridges to groups/perspectives/skills that may not exist in our friendship networks.

Posted by David Lazer at May 19, 2008 8:44 PM

Comments

Hello David, like your idea about ties. Think you are right about this. We do search for homogeneity in ties with our closest friends, but i do think that we form our original ties from examples out of our family, they are our beginning point.

Regards,

Aislin, Erasmus University

Posted by: hypotheek at May 20, 2008 4:32 PM