| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 |
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 |
« Diffusion experiment | Main | Published: Voluntary engagement in knowledge sharing »
21 July 2008
In David Carr's column "The Media Equation" in today's (7/21/08) New York Times, he writes about the amazing growth of Facebook usage and visits. Facebook does indeed have its social — and business — prerogatives. The network platform is on a tear right now, achieving numerical parity with MySpace in global reach.
As Carr writes:
Last month, according to comScore, Facebook had 123.9 million unique visitors and 50.6 billion page views worldwide while MySpace had 114.6 million unique visitors and 45.4 billion page views. MySpace still dominates in the United States, but if my page is any indication, a lot of people who aren’t texting OMG about the guy sitting in the next booth feel a need to opt in to social media.According to company executives, Facebook, which has over 80 million subscribers worldwide, doubled the number of subscribers under 35 last year, but it tripled the number of subscribers between 35 and 54. Early adopters of Facebook, which was the province of students until 2006, must wonder who let all the old guys in. Sometime in the next day or so, Facebook will unveil a major new design for the site, which users can opt-in to.
Facebook is indeed on a tear. One wonders what it's now worth ......
Posted by Stan Wasserman at July 21, 2008 8:14 PM
I've been a user of both social networking sites for years now, and I've watched Facebook go from a no-fun simple "Classmates"-esque framework (where the coolest thing to do was post on the Wall of others) to a fully interactive, powerful, yet still "professional" social networking site.
What's the difference between Facebook and MySpace? MySpace is still not-quite-Web 2.0: it has the feel of personalized web pages, with garish user-defined backgrounds, possibly awful music upon entrance, flashing banner ads, and top-bar Web 1.0-like navigation.
I think this is what's going to define the future relative success of Facebook, at bottom. Which is better to view on a small device (iPod or phone)? Facebook. And in a few years, nearly everyone will have a device and wireless plan which includes net browsing (the capability exists today, of course, but Joe Schmoe doesn't usually have browsing included on his plan, or a phone that's optimized for net navigation).
Posted by: TheNKSBlogTeam at July 22, 2008 9:33 AM
I enjoyed reading this post. It's funny you mention the demographic for Face Book changing. We frequent various forums, blogs, etc. concerning social media and my perception is that the younger generation that uses Face Book is not happy by the recent invasion of the "Older Crowd".
Thanks,
Chris Turnquist
Posted by: Chris Turnquist- CEO of a Web Design Company at July 22, 2008 6:22 PM
Both social network sites Facebook and MySpace are both giants in the social media arena. It is true that Facebook is on a roll and it is doing a better job then MySpace, in my opinion. However, being the owner of a small international social network web site and doing a lot of home work on the giants in the social network playing field, I have learned that even though both Facebook and MySpace have the numbers, they both have issues with personal abuse, and intimacy. I and others have been fed viruses and Trojans from MySpace, as well as the child endangerment and abductions. Facebook on the other hand is too clickish, among other things. My point, I know that the purpose of this blog is a comparison of Facebook and MySpace but, I needed to point out that there a lot of internet users looking for a smaller close nit social group, creating an opportunity for smaller and more intimate social network webpage’s to spring up and get a small percentage of social media market pot.
Posted by: Michael Walrath at July 31, 2008 5:18 PM
Facebook and MySpace hae both achieved a critical mass that should see them continue profitably into the future. The questions I have are;
Will they both survive, and
What will the next annoying "trend" be on the net?
Enjoyed you blog :)
Posted by: Brian at August 3, 2008 12:32 PM