August 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Authors' Committee

Chair:

Andy Eggers (Gov)

Members:

Weihua An (Soc)
Kevin Bartz (Stats)
Sebastian Bauhoff (HealthPol)
John Graves (HealthPol)
Justin Grimmer (Gov)
Jens Hainmueller (Gov)
Mike Kellermann (Gov)
Ellie Powell (Gov)
Gary King (Gov)

Weekly Research Workshop Sponsors

Alberto Abadie, Lee Fleming, Adam Glynn, Guido Imbens, Gary King, Kevin Quinn, Jamie Robins, Don Rubin, Chris Winship

Recent Comments

Recent Entries

Categories

Blogroll

Brad DeLong
Cognitive Daily
Complexity & Social Networks
Developing Intelligence
EconLog
The Education Wonks
Empirical Legal Studies
Free Exchange
Freakonomics
Health Care Economist
Junk Charts
Language Log
Law & Econ Prof Blog
Machine Learning (Theory)
Marginal Revolution
Mixing Memory
Mystery Pollster
New Economist
Political Arithmetik
Political Science Methods
Pure Pedantry
Science & Law Blog
Simon Jackman
Social Science++
Statistical modeling, causal inference, and social science

Archives

Notification

Powered by
Movable Type 4.12


« Applied Statistics - Adam Glynn | Main | Is There a Statistics/Economics Divide? »

1 May 2007

Racial bias in basketball?

The New York Times has an article discussing a working paper by Justin Wolfers and Joseph Price, looking at the rate at which white referees call fouls on black players (and black referees call fouls on white players). The paper can be found here. I haven't had a chance to read it yet, but if it uses "multivariable regression analysis" as it says in the Times article, then I'm sure it must be good.

Posted by Mike Kellermann at May 1, 2007 11:21 PM

Comments

This is an interesting study. I imagine it must have been relatively easy to collect so much data, with the amount of data kept in professional sports (how do they come up with those inane facts and stats on tv so quickly?).

Those that are questioning the validity of the study based on sports strategy, I think, do not understand the scientific nature of the data. I think they are recalling instances rather than looking at the whole.

I also think i would be more interesting to see a study that people could relate to where various "races" are compared around the world, rather than black and white. How do japanese people feel about Americans? How do Turkish people feel about Greeks? How do Native Americans feel about African Amrericans? Do people around the world realize that all people are more the same, than they are different, especially in terms of genetics?

I believe these conversations should continue. The more we know about one another, the better for all.

Posted by: Jota Jota at May 3, 2007 10:39 PM

In such controversy most of the time I find the reality and magnitude of the effect is very small but media make it larger. Should not we stop distinguishing them by calling them Black and white?

Posted by: bob at May 18, 2007 5:58 AM