| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 |
« Applied Statistics - Adam Glynn | Main | Is There a Statistics/Economics Divide? »
1 May 2007
The New York Times has an article discussing a working paper by Justin Wolfers and Joseph Price, looking at the rate at which white referees call fouls on black players (and black referees call fouls on white players). The paper can be found here. I haven't had a chance to read it yet, but if it uses "multivariable regression analysis" as it says in the Times article, then I'm sure it must be good.
Posted by Mike Kellermann at May 1, 2007 11:21 PM
This is an interesting study. I imagine it must have been relatively easy to collect so much data, with the amount of data kept in professional sports (how do they come up with those inane facts and stats on tv so quickly?).
Those that are questioning the validity of the study based on sports strategy, I think, do not understand the scientific nature of the data. I think they are recalling instances rather than looking at the whole.
I also think i would be more interesting to see a study that people could relate to where various "races" are compared around the world, rather than black and white. How do japanese people feel about Americans? How do Turkish people feel about Greeks? How do Native Americans feel about African Amrericans? Do people around the world realize that all people are more the same, than they are different, especially in terms of genetics?
I believe these conversations should continue. The more we know about one another, the better for all.
Posted by: Jota Jota at May 3, 2007 10:39 PM
In such controversy most of the time I find the reality and magnitude of the effect is very small but media make it larger. Should not we stop distinguishing them by calling them Black and white?
Posted by: bob at May 18, 2007 5:58 AM