rapidPeer
Free, independent pre-journal peer review: double-blind expert feedback on papers, grants, and pre-registration plans in under 30 days.
Why rapidPeer?
Boost your publication odds
Get a professional-quality review without using a journal submission.
Accelerate your publishing timeline
Catch flaws before they do; submit with peace of mind and get published faster.
Save time and money
Get early-stage feedback and head in the right direction from the start.
How Does It Work?
Submit your research
Select potential reviewers
Quality peer review delivered in 30 days
Revise and submit for publication
rapidPeer Success Stories
Reviews "were helpful, detailed, and provided friendly, deeply constructive feedback. I am sure that the paper would have been rejected out of hand if I hadn’t [used rapidPeer]”.
"The mutual anonymity [makes] it possible for [reviewers] to feel comfortable criticizing the work, and I [get] timely feedback—within a month."
rapidPeer "improves efficiency and productivity by giving researchers access to valuable feedback along the way rather than waiting until their manuscript is complete".
"You only get so many bites of the apple with journals", rapidPeer is "a way to get well-positioned to be published".
Fast-Tracked Research Showcase
Labor Economics
Wow did the political climate influence anti-Black media content in the 1890s?
New Media & Society
Do high- and low-credibility publishers operate in distinct news ecosystems?
Psychology
How are near-space views represented in the brain's visual cortex?
Editorial Team
Dr. Steven Worthington
rapidPeer Director
Director of Data Science
Harvard University
Dr. Dan Yuan
rapidPeer Managing Editor
Data Science and Project Management Specialist
Harvard University
Reviewers come from these institutions and more
